MANAGE-1.3 Responses to the AI risks deemed high priority, as identified by the MAP function, are developed, planned, and documented. Risk response options can include mitigating, transferring, avoiding, or accepting.
What the standard requires
Responses to the AI risks deemed high priority as identified by the Map function, are developed, planned, and documented. Risk response options can include mitigating, transferring, avoiding, or accepting.
Quoted verbatim from NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0), which is in the public domain.
Maps to 2 controls in 2 other frameworks
| Framework | Control |
|---|---|
| ISO/IEC 42001:2023 | A.5.2 AI-System Impact-Assessment Process |
| NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 | ID.RA-06 Risk responses are chosen, prioritized, planned, tracked, and communicated |
Mappings are CMDash’s own, seeded with the product and shown on both frameworks they connect. In the product they mean evidence you attach here also counts against the controls listed above.
Integrations that carry evidence for this family
These connectors produce data relevant to NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0’s MANAGE family, which is the granularity CMDash publishes — there is no pre-built per-control mapping, and claiming one would be inventing it. You decide which evidence answers which control.
In CMDash this control is a row with an owner, a status, uploaded evidence kept with its full history, and an export an assessor can read.