GOVERN-1.5 Ongoing monitoring and periodic review of the risk management process and its outcomes are planned and organizational roles and responsibilities clearly defined, including determining the frequency of periodic review.
What the standard requires
Ongoing monitoring and periodic review of the risk management process and its outcomes are planned, organizational roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, including determining the frequency of periodic review.
Quoted verbatim from NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0), which is in the public domain.
Maps to 1 control in 1 other framework
| Framework | Control |
|---|---|
| NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 | GV.OV-01 Cybersecurity risk management strategy outcomes are reviewed to inform and adjust strategy and direction |
Mappings are CMDash’s own, seeded with the product and shown on both frameworks they connect. In the product they mean evidence you attach here also counts against the controls listed above.
Integrations that carry evidence for this family
These connectors produce data relevant to NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0’s GOVERN family, which is the granularity CMDash publishes — there is no pre-built per-control mapping, and claiming one would be inventing it. You decide which evidence answers which control.
In CMDash this control is a row with an owner, a status, uploaded evidence kept with its full history, and an export an assessor can read.