FedRAMP Moderate
The full NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Moderate baseline across all 19 control families, with the verbatim public-domain control text.
What FedRAMP Moderate is
FedRAMP is the US government's authorisation programme for cloud services. A cloud service provider selling to federal agencies needs an Authority to Operate, and the Moderate baseline — appropriate where a loss of confidentiality, integrity or availability would have a serious adverse effect — is where the overwhelming majority of commercial FedRAMP work happens.
The Moderate baseline is drawn from NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, spanning all nineteen control families from Access Control through to Program Management, including the control enhancements the baseline selects. It is by a wide margin the largest control set in this catalogue, and that is not incidental: the volume is the reason FedRAMP programmes fail, and the reason they need tooling rather than a spreadsheet.
One naming point worth being exact about, because vendors are routinely sloppy here: NIST SP 800-53 is a control catalogue, not a compliance framework you can be assessed against. What organisations are actually assessed against is a baseline drawn from it. CMDash does not list "NIST 800-53" as a framework for that reason — what ships is FedRAMP Moderate, and it carries the 800-53 Rev 5 Moderate baseline.
Who it applies to
- Cloud service providers pursuing a FedRAMP authorisation, whether through an agency sponsor or the JAB.
- Organisations with a StateRAMP or agency-specific requirement derived from the same baseline.
- Anyone who has been asked for "800-53 Moderate" and needs the actual control set rather than the catalogue.
- Federal contractors who need 800-53 control language to satisfy a flow-down requirement.
How it is structured in CMDash
CMDash seeds the Moderate baseline across all nineteen control families, expanding control enhancements into their own rows so that evidence attaches per enhancement rather than being lumped under the base control — the same convention used for TISAX sub-controls.
| Access Control | 45 |
| Audit & Accountability | 20 |
| Assessment & Authorization | 14 |
| Configuration Management | 25 |
| Contingency Planning | 24 |
| Identification & Authentication | 22 |
| Incident Response | 17 |
| Risk Assessment | 9 |
| System & Communications Protection | 27 |
| System & Information Integrity | 23 |
| Awareness & Training | 6 |
| Maintenance | 10 |
| Media Protection | 9 |
| Physical & Environmental | 18 |
| Planning | 7 |
| Personnel Security | 9 |
| System & Services Acquisition | 16 |
| Supply Chain Risk Management | 12 |
| Program Management | 15 |
These counts are the control rows CMDash actually seeds, checked against the seed files by a test on every build.
The control text
326 of the 328 seeded controls carry the publisher’s own wording, taken from NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 (OSCAL catalog). It is public-domain content, so CMDash reproduces it rather than paraphrasing — you assess against what the publisher wrote.
What CMDash does for FedRAMP Moderate
- Verbatim NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 control text on very nearly the entire baseline, taken from the OSCAL catalogue. 800-53 is public-domain US-government content, so the real control language is in the product rather than a paraphrase.
- A FedRAMP-format POA&M export with the extended columns — POA&M identifier, weakness description, risk level, point of contact, resources required, scheduled completion date, milestones and source of finding.
- Seeded crosswalks to NIST CSF, HITRUST CSF and TISAX, which matters more here than elsewhere: an organisation that has done FedRAMP has done an enormous amount of work, and the crosswalks are how it gets reused.
- A read-only, time-boxed assessor seat scoped to FedRAMP, which is the practical answer to giving a 3PAO access without handing out a shared login.
- An evidence package export — a ZIP with a manifest, the files and data snapshots — for the volume of artefacts a FedRAMP assessment demands.
- Every control is a tracked row with an owner, a status (not started, in progress, implemented, not applicable, at risk, failing), reviewer notes, and its own evidence requirements — not a checkbox on a spreadsheet.
- Evidence is uploaded against a specific control, dated, and kept on that control, so an assessor can see what was true when.
- Gaps export to a POA&M CSV — every control that is not implemented and not marked out of scope, with owner, status and evidence requirements.
- Policies you author in CMDash link to the controls they govern, so each control row shows which living policies stand behind it.
- A time-boxed, read-only external assessor seat can be scoped to just this framework, with an expiry date you set and a record of every page they opened.
What it shares with your other frameworks
CMDash seeds control-to-control crosswalk mappings, each with a confidence score. They are what stops the same artefact being gathered twice, and they are how a second framework costs a fraction of the first.
Where the evidence comes from
CMDash reads from the security tools you already run and turns what they report into control evidence. These are the integrations whose data lands closest to FedRAMP Moderate’s control groups — you decide which control each signal evidences, and CMDash keeps it current from then on.
Where CMDash stops
Published on purpose. A buyer who discovers a limit after signing is a support ticket and a refund conversation; a buyer who reads it here is making an informed decision.
- Moderate only. The High and Low baselines are not seeded, and neither is FedRAMP Tailored / Li-SaaS.
- A small number of baseline rows do not have verbatim text attached; those carry the identifier, title and evidence guidance and leave the full text empty rather than substituting synthesised wording.
- CMDash does not produce the OSCAL SSP package that FedRAMP submission requires, and it is not a 3PAO. It tracks the controls, the evidence and the gaps.
- The generated System Security Plan carries the same labelled "contractor action required" placeholders for system description, boundary and governance as the CMMC one.
Common questions
Why is there no "NIST 800-53" framework in CMDash?
Because 800-53 is a control catalogue, not an assessable framework — you are assessed against a baseline selected from it. Listing 800-53 as a supported framework would be advertising something no organisation can actually be certified against. What ships is FedRAMP Moderate, which is the 800-53 Rev 5 Moderate baseline, with the verbatim control text.
Can CMDash get us a FedRAMP ATO?
No. An ATO is granted by an agency or the JAB after a 3PAO assessment. CMDash tracks the baseline, holds the evidence, produces the POA&M in FedRAMP format and gives your assessor scoped read-only access. The authorisation itself is not something any tool can produce.
What about FedRAMP High?
Not seeded. Moderate is what ships today. Saying so is more useful than implying coverage you would discover was missing after signing.
Also in Government & Defense
Paid plans cap how many frameworks you run at once, never which ones — FedRAMP Moderate is available on every paid plan.
View pricingReady to see your posture?
Start a 30-day free trial of any paid plan — a card is required, and it converts unless you cancel — or sign up for Free with no card at all.