Art.13(2) Designated spokesperson
What the standard requires
2. Financial entities shall put in place post ICT-related incident reviews after a major ICT-related incident disrupts their core activities, analysing the causes of disruption and identifying required improvements to the ICT operations or within the ICT business continuity policy referred to in Article 11. Financial entities, other than microenterprises, shall, upon request, communicate to the competent authorities, the changes that were implemented following post ICT-related incident reviews as referred to in the first subparagraph. The post ICT-related incident reviews referred to in the first subparagraph shall determine whether the established procedures were followed and the actions taken were effective, including in relation to the following: (a) the promptness in responding to security alerts and determining the impact of ICT-related incidents and their severity; (b) the quality and speed of performing a forensic analysis, where deemed appropriate; (c) the effectiveness of incident escalation within the financial entity; (d) the effectiveness of internal and external communication.
Quoted verbatim from Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 (DORA), which is in the public domain.
Cross-framework mappings
No cross-framework mapping is seeded for this control. That is stated rather than filled in: a mapping nobody authored is worse than a gap you can see.
Integrations that carry evidence for this family
These connectors produce data relevant to DORA’s ICT Risk Management family, which is the granularity CMDash publishes — there is no pre-built per-control mapping, and claiming one would be inventing it. You decide which evidence answers which control.
In CMDash this control is a row with an owner, a status, uploaded evidence kept with its full history, and an export an assessor can read.