CMDash as an alternative to SecurityScorecard
Same sourced comparison as CMDash vs. SecurityScorecard, framed for switching: 1 dimension below favor CMDash, 1 favor SecurityScorecard — including where SecurityScorecard is built to do something CMDash deliberately doesn’t.
| Dimension | CMDash | SecurityScorecard |
|---|---|---|
Product category Source, verified 2026-09-06 — https://securityscorecard.com/pricing/. May have changed since. | CISO Dashboard | Security ratings / third-party risk monitoring platform (TITAN Watch, Assess, Secure) |
Pricing publicly published (no sales call required to see it) Source, verified 2026-09-06 — https://securityscorecard.com/pricing/. May have changed since. | CMDash advantage: Yes — $1,788.00 / $17,988.00 / Custom | No — Core/Premium/Elite tiers are named and priced by number of organizations monitored, but no rates are shown; a free trial and a "Free Forever" basic account exist |
How CMDash and SecurityScorecard relate packages/shared/src/landscape/areas.json — CMDash's own published landscape catalog entry on outside-in ratings | Ingests SecurityScorecard's rating through a native adapter as one input into the daily dashboard — but has no first-party scanning of its own; coverage is only as complete as the connected subscription | Vendor advantage: Standalone outside-in ratings platform — rates organizations, including ones without a subscription, from external signals alone |
You do not need to export anything from SecurityScorecard first. CMDash’s native TPRM adapter reads your existing SecurityScorecard ratings directly once you add your API key under vendor monitoring, so switching does not mean losing that subscription’s data — it becomes one input alongside everything else CMDash tracks.
Every figure above is the same sourced, dated fact table /compare/securityscorecard renders — nothing here is retyped for this page. Pricing and product capabilities change; think something above is wrong or out of date? Tell us and we’ll fix it.